37/100
Poor
12750 Riverside Drive, North Hollywood, CA 91607
These are findings in the public CMS record for this home. They are not our opinion — each one comes straight from a federal inspection or enforcement file.
Special Focus Facility
CMS has placed this home in its Special Focus Facility program for a persistent pattern of poor care. These homes get inspected twice as often.
3 citation(s) involving actual harm or immediate jeopardy
Inspectors found violations at scope/severity G or above, meaning residents were harmed or placed in immediate jeopardy.
$202,260 in federal fines
CMS has fined this facility across 1 penalty action(s).
Every point is shown. Nothing is weighted behind the scenes — the full formula is on How we grade.
A full pentagon is full marks. The shape shows what kind of good or bad a home is — two homes can share a score and look nothing alike.
Citations from state health inspections over the last three surveys, weighted by how much harm CMS says they caused.
Nursing hours per resident per day, adjusted for how sick the residents are, plus RN cover and weekend consistency.
How much of the nursing team leaves in a year. High turnover means a resident rarely sees the same face twice.
The CMS quality-measure rating, built from resident outcomes like falls, pressure ulcers, infections and antipsychotic use.
Fines and payment denials CMS has imposed. A denial of payment means CMS stopped paying for new admissions.
Grade ceiling applied
Hours of nursing care each resident receives per day. The marker on each bar is the national average.
RNs are the licence level most likely to catch a resident deteriorating.
The shift most families visit, and the one thinned first.
The share of nursing staff who left over the last year.
Last standard health inspection: August 1, 2025 (1 year ago).
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm
Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies
Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm
Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm
Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm
Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm
Administration Deficiencies
Establish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm
Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm
Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies
Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm
Part of LONGWOOD MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, which operates 38 homes. Staffing budgets are usually set at chain level, not in the building.
| Owner | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| NELSON, TARYN | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — |
| FRIEDMAN, IRA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — |
| FRIEDMAN FAMILY TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — |
| IRA D FRIEDMAN 1991 TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — |
| LEHMANN FAMILY 1991 TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — |
| THE KLAVAN FAMILY TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — |
| THE TZIPPY FRIEDMAN NOTIS 1990 TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — |
| FRIEDMAN, AARON | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — |
| KLAVAN, RACHEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — |
| LEHMANN, LIBBY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — |
No family reviews yet for Sherman Village Hcc. If you or a relative have experience of this home, other families would find it useful.
Be the first to reviewEvery review is confirmed by email and read by a moderator before it appears. We remove reviews written by or for a facility. If something is wrong right now, report a concern — that routes you to your state ombudsman, who can actually intervene.
Sherman Village Hcc holds an ElderGrade of F (37 out of 100), which we describe as "poor". The grade combines its inspection citations, nurse staffing levels, staff turnover, resident outcomes and enforcement history from the federal CMS record.
Residents receive an average of 4.98 nursing hours per day across all nursing staff, against a national average of 3.86 hours.
Yes. 3 of the 106 citations on record were scored at scope and severity G or above, meaning inspectors found actual harm to a resident or immediate jeopardy to resident safety.
Yes, Sherman Village Hcc is certified to accept Medicaid, which is the programme that pays for long-term custodial care once a resident meets their state's income and asset limits.