38/100
Poor
One Bathol Street, Wakefield, MA 01880
These are findings in the public CMS record for this home. They are not our opinion — each one comes straight from a federal inspection or enforcement file.
5 citation(s) involving actual harm or immediate jeopardy
Inspectors found violations at scope/severity G or above, meaning residents were harmed or placed in immediate jeopardy.
$63,843 in federal fines
CMS has fined this facility across 1 penalty action(s).
Every point is shown. Nothing is weighted behind the scenes — the full formula is on How we grade.
Citations from state health inspections over the last three surveys, weighted by how much harm CMS says they caused.
Nursing hours per resident per day, adjusted for how sick the residents are.
How much of the nursing team leaves in a year. High turnover means a resident rarely sees the same face twice.
The CMS quality-measure rating, built from resident outcomes like falls, pressure ulcers, infections and antipsychotic use.
Fines and payment denials CMS has imposed. A denial of payment means CMS stopped paying for new admissions.
Grade ceiling applied
Hours of nursing care each resident receives per day. The marker on each bar is the national average.
RNs are the licence level most likely to catch a resident deteriorating.
The shift most families visit, and the one thinned first.
The share of nursing staff who left over the last year.
Last standard health inspection: March 3, 2026 (5 months ago).
Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies
Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Actual harm to a resident
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm
Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies
Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm
Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies
Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm
Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm
Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm
Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled...
No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm
Part of VANTAGE CARE, which operates 9 homes. Staffing budgets are usually set at chain level, not in the building.
| Owner | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIGUOSATILE, AUGUSTINE | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — |
| YUMASI, VIVIENNE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — |
| YUROWITZ, SAM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — |
| AREM, CHERYL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — |
| BROWN, YOSSI | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — |
| HERSKOVITZ, MIRIAM | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — |
| YUROWITZ, SAM | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — |
| JPW MASS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — |
| VANTAGE CARE MA4 LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — |
No family reviews yet for Regalcare At Wakefield. If you or a relative have experience of this home, other families would find it useful.
Be the first to reviewEvery review is confirmed by email and read by a moderator before it appears. We remove reviews written by or for a facility. If something is wrong right now, report a concern — that routes you to your state ombudsman, who can actually intervene.
Regalcare At Wakefield holds an ElderGrade of F (38 out of 100), which we describe as "poor". The grade combines its inspection citations, nurse staffing levels, staff turnover, resident outcomes and enforcement history from the federal CMS record.
This facility has not reported staffing hours to CMS in the current data release.
Yes. 5 of the 42 citations on record were scored at scope and severity G or above, meaning inspectors found actual harm to a resident or immediate jeopardy to resident safety.
Yes, Regalcare At Wakefield is certified to accept Medicaid, which is the programme that pays for long-term custodial care once a resident meets their state's income and asset limits.